Allan Webber at Marino Rocks May 2016

Conclusions to The Jesus Debacles.
© Allan Webber 2016

"Nostradamus' story is about the way a future time of turmoil brings about the resurrection of Jesus thereby precipitating disastrous wars."
  Michel de Nostredame

I begin my conclusions with a personal comment because if left unsaid few will understand why I wrote this work. My research leads me to conclude Nostradamus was not a charlatan but did have visions that he sincerely believed were accurate reflections of the future. My doubts arise not because any of the above is untrue but because even if every bit is valid it still leaves open the possibility he was deluded by the nature of his source.

I am confident that this book is different to anything anyone else has written about Nostradamus' Prophecies since I come with different motives to those of my contemporaries and predecessors. My goal has never been to help me or anyone else to prophesy the future nor has it been to show every little event relevant from our times is part of Nostradamus' verses.

My motivation has always been to understand the nature of time, evolution and the origin of concepts. I chose to unravel Nostradamus' deliberately obscure writings because his work challenged modern understanding of the way future relates to time.

I began with a belief I would quickly find his writings hid nothing real and that his works were inconsistent sixteenth century mysticism. In achieving this I would obviously be seeking to find out what his works really said but my expectation was it would be quite mundane. But I was wrong and although still sceptical over many aspects I now accept that his works contain a genuine attempt to explain time and the evolutionary path of humankind.

The major story is actually contained within his texts but hidden from sight by encouraging misconceptions that are latent in all readers. Nostradamus' story is about the way a future time of turmoil brings about the resurrection of Jesus thereby precipitating disastrous wars. This is the story which could not openly be told but important enough for Nostradamus to want to tell.

The methods by which I uncover the richness in Nostradamus' writings are unique with each aspect soundly based in pragmatic tools however some of the outcomes will rightly be considered controversial. Most readers will find highly acceptable that Nostradamus used ciphers and anagrams to allow his tales to be understood and then placed in relevant thematic groupings. But even such reasonable methods do have weaknesses because they open up the possibility of chance occurrences. All decoding faces that same issue and yet these accidental intrusions can be controlled by the use of disciplined filters and relevance of context.

One of the most controversial aspects of my work is that the use of these techniques leads to knowledge that is outside what an enlightened person could have known from history. In this book I have tried to downplay that side of my findings and restrict my writings to that which arises directly from his texts. However it would be dishonest of me and far less enlightening if I only used the weakest elements of his writings without showing what else lies dormant in the works.

Accordingly, the deductions from the surface content are often accompanied by consistent relationships with terms from a time five hundred years or more beyond Nostradamus' life. Their origin may, despite its seemingly extraordinary modernity, turn out to be mundane but the problem is these findings flirt with impossibility. It would be easiest for me if they had attributes whereby chance explained their generation but this is not the case.  I chose to include them in this book for the consistent connections they reveal not as proof but as evidence of the enigma they present for our understanding of time.

Under our current understanding of time anagrams from the future cannot be intentional. If even the few I mention in this book exist with all the strengths I find then in some yet unknown way Nostradamus' writings were affected by the future.

Nostradamus' words rightfully attract immense derision because much of the written texts are so vague that they are either meaningless or able to be misconstrued by fanciful minds. Yet he didn't have to put the worst of these in at all and there still would have been enough to excite the future. That there are so many suggests that this flotsam is either rubbish or there is a means within their lettering to give each verse connections and significance. It is this latter interpretation of sense that forms the basis of my decoding every verse.

My methods centre on the motivation causing Nostradamus to write about events more than 500 years in his future since it is his motivation that sets the standard by which his credibility can be judged. To this end using Nostradamus' words I establish that his interest came about from visions where modernity entraps the Christian religions into a series of wars. These wars have a single aim, to destroy the line that dares claim their children carry DNA from Jesus Christ. This is the reason big enough to justify the manner in which the Prophecies were composed. It also provides the full reason for the themes and topics that lie within each of his writings.

But such a dramatic story seems bizarre even though it is well known he deliberately wrote in a way that would take centuries to decipher. By using the three documents that make up his prophecies I can show he left unambiguous clues. These enable the original intent to be resurrected much like the story of Christ that it enfolds. What makes my method worthy of reading is that each major step relies on Nostradamus' writings not mine and these steps are applied with discipline. These strictures are designed to prevent fabrication and to make it so every step can be seen and judged by any reader.

His words in the Epistle to Cesar (1555) tell us his view of how he read the future and when his magician's tricks of illusion are removed his method is one that has plausibility. He recognises distinctions between eternity and evolutionary concepts of time and to a bridge based on resonance that is consistent with the known operations of the brain.

This brings another of my problems. I am always in personal conflict by where his writings take me since I believe no human person can see the future and I can find no evidence that Nostradamus was anything but human. I believe we cannot know the future before it happens because until that time it is only speculative. That restriction is inherent in mankind's relationship with time but it is the nature of time and evolution that leave the question open.

If life continues to evolve it is likely to be the bridge to future time that evolutionary processes will master. Evolution has already overcome every obstacle to living in the instance that distinguishes living things from the inanimate. Concepts such as awareness and memory exist solely through the adaptation of the moment to exploit the past. So I cannot write off the possibility that life will master what seems unthinkable to our kind but likewise I must acknowledge there is no evidence that any form of current life sees into the distant future.

The Epistle to Henry (1558) also offers a path to decoding the Prophecies. It offers a powerful tool based on his key words in the narrative sections of the Epistle. These ciphers are pointers to verses in the Prophecies that hold the same terms. It is through this spreading net that a fuller picture is able to be seen. It is by these guides that the foundations for several parts of the stories are built regarding the Jesus re-creation debacle and its subsequent wars.

The contents of the Preface have another device dealing with a mechanism that gives the essential details of the physical circumstances impacting the world at the time of the Jesus resurrection tale. These settings rely on perfect astronomic cycles that have nothing to do with astrology. Within this scheme the changing of the Polar Star in 2105 is the most significant marker used to bring the three documents, Epistle, Preface and Prophecies into one unified tale.

There are other issues raised within my chapters that emerge as the major stories unfold.

The peak height of the floods at 200m in 300 years is one such fact determined when the order in the verses is able to be seen.

Another important feature of Nostradamus' work is that his tales aren't the story of the imminent end of our kind but a telling of our fate before evolutionary forces cause our species to no longer be the dominant species on this planet. To this end Nostradamus nominates 3797CE as the date to which his visions allow him to go. 

There is much more contained with Nostradamus' Prophecies than I have conveyed through this current book. The nature of these stories is contained in my research materials on my website.

But there is still the enigma in another aspect of my findings that I must openly acknowledge. How can it be that Nostradamus' lettering delivers patterns that are more distinctive than I find in other texts? How can chance create so many patterns that reinforce Nostradamus' writings while others in which he shows no interest are absent? How can these patterns deliver powerful clusters relevant to the text if they are the products of chance alone? Yet they are there, a mystery awaiting the mundane adaptation towards which science strives by a process that rightfully normalises the aberrations in our understanding of the world.

PREVIOUS
 
HOME
 
NEXT


WEBSITE

free web stats